Love in the Abstract: What Film Can Teach Us About Heartbreak
Film speaks in a language of images, sound, and rhythm—subtle signals that steer our expectations. A still frame can suggest calm and control; pulsing music often signals chaos or fear. These conventions are part of why we watch movies: they let us step into stories that feel familiar and coherent, offering an ordered escape from the messiness of everyday life.
Filmmakers, however, also want to surprise. They want to lead us somewhere unexpected, to evoke emotions that aren’t entirely verbalizable. When cinematic techniques are overused, audiences grow comfortable and stories become predictable. The challenge for filmmakers is finding a balance between structure and genuine feeling—if such a balance is even necessary.
Richard Linklater’s Before Sunrise (1995) follows two strangers, Jesse and Celine, who meet on a train and spend a single night in Vienna talking, arguing, and discovering one another. The film relies on candid conversation and an economical structure, yet it reaches an affecting emotional core. We feel the characters’ nervousness and fragile connection, and when the night ends the uncertainty is palpable. This clear, dialogue-driven approach proves that straightforward storytelling can be deeply moving.
Other filmmakers, though, argue that love and longing are inherently abstract and resist literal representation. Wong Kar-wai’s Chungking Express (1994) presents two interwoven vignettes about lonely city dwellers. Objects and small actions—the ritual of buying canned pineapples, the way a woman occupies another person’s apartment—stand in for emotional states. He Qiwu’s attachment to canned pineapples marks the end of a relationship; Cop 663 talks to the items in his flat and deals with heartbreak by inhabiting routines. The film’s most powerful moments emerge not from explicit explanation but from gestures, lingering glances, and the choreography of movement across the frame.
Chungking Express resists a single-genre classification, blending crime, comedy, and drama into a vivid urban collage. Conventional romance dramas often follow predictable beats—meetings, separations, reconciliations, infidelities—signposts that can flatten emotion when relied upon too heavily. By contrast, Wong’s film trusts the audience to feel rather than to be told, and the result lingers because it privileges impression over exposition.
Michel Gondry’s Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind (2004) embraces abstraction through a narrative set largely inside Joel’s (Jim Carrey) mind as his memories of Clementine (Kate Winslet) are erased. Memory here is treated as mutable and uncanny: scenes fold into one another, spaces shift, and dreamlike horror imagery visualizes the emotional terror of losing someone you loved. Rather than aiming for documentary realism, Gondry uses genre techniques—surrealism, elements of horror and fantasy—to make interior states visible and visceral. The film’s emotional truth comes from how it feels, not how faithfully it maps to everyday logic.
By bending genre and privileging image and mood, these filmmakers access a subconscious register of storytelling—one that acknowledges how inconsistent and contradictory human emotion can be. Love resists neat categorization, so art that depicts it need not be tidy. When filmmakers borrow the visual language of other genres, they create a richer, less predictable emotional palette.
Audiences often enter a screening expecting certain conventions—a comedy will make them laugh, a romance will resolve happily—and those expectations can protect viewers from discomfort. But they can also dull the impact of a film. Films that trade conventional structure for evocative impressions can unsettle us in productive ways: a house swallowed by waves as a couple says goodbye, a plane ticket drawn with no destination, familiar moments transformed into strange, poetic images. These impressions don’t always provide tidy answers, but they stay with us.
Ultimately, both candid realism and impressionistic abstraction are valid approaches. A well-made, trope-driven film can still move us deeply if it is honest and rooted in human experience. What matters is an emotional core the audience can connect with—an ability to surprise, to reveal something true. Declaring one tactic superior to another oversimplifies the possibilities of cinema; instead, it’s useful to question the limitations we impose on ourselves by clinging to expectations or insisting on literal clarity.
Connection is central to human life. We long to be seen and understood, yet trust and forgiveness are often complicated by past hurt. Love changes people in ways that might be irrational or inexplicable to outsiders; each person’s experience of love is private and singular. Cinema that mirrors this complexity—by refusing to justify or neatly explain every feeling—can produce profound moments of recognition. When we set aside expectations and allow a film to speak in images and moods, we may find ourselves affected more deeply than a strictly literal account could achieve.
Written by Sam Florsheim
You can support Sam Florsheim in the following places:
Instagram – @samflorsh
Website – samflorsheim.com